Today i received a formal notification that my abstract "The contemporary symbolic construction of Norway's Big Bad Wolf" has been accepted for oral presentation at the second Minding Animals conference, which is to take place in Utrecht, the Netherlands, July 3-6.
See also my note on a similar notification concerning another abstract, "Biosemiotics and animal ethics".
***
THE CONTEMPORARY SYMBOLIC CONSTRUCTION OF NORWAY'S BIG BAD WOLF
THE CONTEMPORARY SYMBOLIC CONSTRUCTION OF NORWAY'S BIG BAD WOLF
Morten Tønnessen
Current carnivore management would not have met
such hostile resistance from an outspoken minority on the Norwegian countryside,
had it not been for some current developments which are all too seldom related
to the wolf conservation discourse. Notably, since 1999 one third of all farms
in Norway have closed down. In reality the wolves are not blamed for the relatively
few sheep they kill — they have come to symbolize the threats, dangers and
decline facing Norwegian agriculture. The wolf, in short, has become a scapegoat for certain societal
developments.
The symbolic value of wolves and sheep has
historically often been juxtaposed, especially in the context of the Bible. In
cultural terms, hardly any animals are as loaded with symbolic value as the
wolf and the sheep. And the shared importance is no coincidence, since the
symbolism of the two animals has frequently developed in explicit opposition to
each other. In the Scandinavian context in general and the Norwegian in
particular the wolf’s vivid symbolicity in contemporary times is enforced by
the occurrence of conspiracy theories. Many of the fiercest opponents of wolf conservation
believe that researchers and the authorities intentionally misrepresent the
population number of wolves, and distrust official reassurances that the wolf
does not pose much danger to people. In result, the human perception of wolves
has in large measure decoupled from ecological reality.
This decoupling of perception and empirical
circumstances does not only apply to conspiracy theorists. Whenever national
Norwegian media cover predation on sheep, for instance, the wolf is typically
pictured for illustrative purposes — despite the fact that wolverines, lynx,
and brown bears over time all account for a much greater percentage of
predation on sheep. The wolf has thus become a poster boy for large predators in general. What wolves are taken to
signify, in short, depends not so much on actual wolf ecology as it does on
certain cultural/societal developments. These are, justly or unfairly,
associated with the presence of wolves, and with governmental conservation
policies. What the wolf is taken to represent as a sign — what it is taken to
be a sign of — has become the decisive driver in the Norwegian wolf management
discourse.
The sheep’s symbolicity is in the Norwegian
context grounded in open landscapes, which are typically taken to be
intrinsically Norwegian. The idea of the Norwegian nation is built on the
memory of an initial clearing and cultivation of the original (pre-Norwegian)
landscape. We see this plainly in the two first verses of Ivar Aasen’s “The
Norwegian”, which is in effect treated as a national anthem.
The symbolicity of sheep in Norway is
effectively associated with the symbolicity of outer pastures, which have been crucial in Norwegian sheep
husbandry but are now under pressure, partly due to a general move from
extensive to intensive farming practices. The common perception in rural areas
is that outer pastures are being devalued, and that traditional Norwegian
farming practices are under threat. In visual imagery, this is best expressed
by a phenomenon called ‘gjengroing’, imperfectly translated to English as overgrowth.
Overgrowth in this sense implies that an originally open, cleared landscape is
taken over by forest, weeds and other vegetation without direct agricultural
value. Such a landscape, with growing irrelevance (so to speak), reduced
utility and (notably, in perceptual terms) an obstructed view, has become a
symbol of the hardships of rural areas and Norwegian agriculture. Our thesis is
that it is this perception which is at the base of the contemporary symbolic
construction of the Big Bad Wolf in Norway.
No comments:
Post a Comment