Existential universals: A link between biosemiotics
and existential semiotics
Morten Tønnessen
Abstract submitted for the symposium Nordic
Semiotic Paradigms – NASS 25 Years: "Where do Cognitive, Bio- and
Existential Semiotics Meet?"
Associate professor at Department of Health
Studies, University of Stavanger
Researcher in the grant Dynamical Zoosemiotics
and Animal Representations (Department of Semiotics, University of Tartu)
The ten steps to a semiotics of being detailed
in Tønnessen 2010 (and said to be “pertinent to various sub-fields at the
conjunction of semiotics of nature (biosemiotics, ecosemiotics, zoosemiotics)
and semiotics of culture – semioethics and existential semiotics included”)
start out with the following three points:
1) Semiotics of being entails inquiry at all
levels of biological organization, albeit, wherever there are individuals, with
emphasis on the living qua individuals (integrated biological individualism).
2) An Umwelt is the public aspect
(cf. the Innenwelt, the private aspect) of a phenomenal/experienced
world that is organism-specific (rather than species-specific) and ultimately
refers to an existential realm.
3) Existential universals at
work on Earth include seeking out the edible, dwelling in a medium, holding a
phenomenal world (possibly an Umwelt) and being endowed with life, and
followingly being mortal.
This paper will present the notion of
existential universals, and sketch how these can be seen as a link between
biosemiotics and existential semiotics. Though existential universals can be
articulated and conceptualized in a variety of ways, and any chronological
exposition may well be at least in part arbitrary, a list of such universal
features of life will be presented. Not all semiosis is conceptualized as
existential, i.e., by nature experientially related to the existence of a
being. Consequently, not all ‘biosemiotic universals’ qualify as existential
universals. All existential universals, however, are necessarily universals of
biosemiosis.
What is it like to be a human being? (In other words: What is the
human condition?). Before we can answer that question, we have to answer a more
general question, the answer to which has foundational validity for the human
question, namely: What is it like to be a living being? In
this paper I will allude to sixteen answers to that question.
Reference
Tønnessen, Morten 2010. Steps to a semiotics of
being. Biosemiotics 3.3: 375-392.
No comments:
Post a Comment