UTOPISM. *** In the long run, nothing else is realistic. *** Welcome to the English language blog of Morten Tønnessen, Professor of philosophy at University of Stavanger's Department of Social Studies.
I have been notified that my paper submitted to NEEN26, the NEEN & ISEE Conference on Environmental Ethics which is to be held at Umeå University, Sweden, October 14-16th, titled "The ethical case against Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)", has been rejected by the organisers.
This is the second or third time I have had a paper on this theme rejected. For some reason, the ethics of CCS seems to be anathema.
See also:
I have been notified that my proposed paper "Climate economics imaginaries and the contested future of economic growth" has been rejected and will thus not be included in the journal Œconomia – History / Methodology / Philosophy's forthcoming special issue "History of Climate Economics".
As mentioned in a previous post, in the end of August I prepared an abstract in relation to an upcoming special issue of The Journal of Ethics on the theme "Climate ethics: Prospects and Retrospectives", titled "The ethical case against Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)". I have now been notified that my paper has not been selected for inclusion in the special issue.
My article "The HDI´s maximum limit for income is unfounded" has been rejected by Atlantic Economic Journal.
My Letter "The HDI´s maximum limit for income is unfounded" was rejected by Science, I have now submitted it to Nature.
My article "Wasted growth - case study: The American dream or nightmare?" has been rejected by the Journal of Economic Growth.
My article "Wasted growth – case study: The American dream or nightmare?" has been rejected by Applied Research in Quality of Life following peer-review.
I have been informed by the conference organizers that my paper submission for the Second World Inequality Conference, to be held in Paris in December, was not accepted.
