Presentation held at Biosemiotics and culture seminar

On Monday 16th of July I presented my paper "In the gaze of the other: Describingcultural affordances by conducting comparative Umwelt mapping in animal studies" in the seminar "Biosemiotics and the study of culture", convened by Timo Maran, in Tartu. The seminar was a pre-conference seminar associated with the 12th gathering in biosemiotics. There were around 30 people present. Each talk was devoted some 40 minutes including discussion.

Presentation accepted for biosemiotics and culture seminar

My paper "In the gaze of the other: Describing cultural affordances by conducting comparative Umwelt mapping in animal studies" (see abstract) has been accepted for presentation at the seminar "Biosemiotics and the study of culture", which is to take place the day before the 12th gathering in biosemiotics in Tartu, Estonia in mid-July, namely July 16th.

A total of 9 papers appear in the preliminary program, all of which from persons I have either met or at least been in contact with.

Abstract: "In the gaze of the other: Describing cultural affordances by conducting comparative Umwelt mapping in animal studies"

Two days ago I further submitted the following abstract, "In the gaze of the other: Describing cultural affordances by conducting comparative Umwelt mapping in animal studies", to "Biosemiotics and the study of culture", a one-day pre-conference seminar tied to this summer's 12th gathering in biosemiotics, to be held in Tartu July 17-22. The seminar takes place July 16th.

**

In the gaze of the other: Describing cultural affordances by conducting comparative Umwelt mapping in animal studies

Morten Tønnessen, Associate professor at University of Stavanger

The Umwelt theory of Jakob von Uexküll is well known in biosemiotic circles. However, not many have taken to develop Umwelt methodology as foundational for comparative studies. Umwelt theory can e.g. be applied to describe the manifold affordances of human constructions, artefacts etc. from a non-human point of view. Whenever Umwelten are discussed, the focus tends to be on each particular, “species-specific” Umwelt. The human Umwelt is thereby characterised by being fundamentally different from any animal’s Umwelt. But in the age of the Anthropocene – the global era of anthropogenic development – countless animals and other creatures regularly encounter human constructions, artefacts and waste (indeed, numerous lifeforms have adapted to such occurrences). How do the products of human civilization manifest themselves in the Umwelten of other creatures?

This topic – which could also in some measure be conducted by way of a comparative study of humans as Umwelt objects in non-human Umwelten – can be organised in terms of four major categories, enveloping human products as perceived by non-humans

1) in urban and household settings

2) in agriculture

3) in wildlife settings

4) in “the shadows of human civilization” (think of rats thriving in our sewage systems, etc.)

Some of these categories may overlap somewhat. In combination they represent the way our culture qua human products appears in the Umwelten of non-humans – in the gaze of the other.